Amateur Finds
Page 1 of 1 • Share •
Amateur Finds
Premiss: the things I'm going to type here SHOULD NOT break any embargo breach since paper has been published and submitted at ArXiv.org too. Moreover they also should not have a scientific significance since based on few data available and most of results come from approximations. Nevertheless what's come out sounds interesting.
Do you remember the paper A Dedicated M Dwarf Planet Search Using The Hobby-Eberly Telescope?
The paper talks about detection efficiency of low mass exoplanets around nearby red dwarfs. Even a more recent one from UVES talks about the same but observing another stock of nearby M dwarfs.
However radial velocity sets are not available in written form, but in graphical one. Employing bitmap, wordpad and a bit of patience, I've extracted vels and sys files for related stellar objects and I've performed a Systemic Console search for planets.
Results are interesting.
Most of the stars show clear signals of short-period bodies in tight orbits and few ones even hints of additional longer period companions.
Among these I notice the very nearby star GJ 687 (or BD+68 946) once suspected to host a massive substellar object in wide and eccentric orbit (>10 Mj e<0.9). Well, the best fit consist in a close-in hot earth and a "low-mass" brown dwarf (or massive superplanet) at 6.17 AUs and e=0.8.
Between survey stars there is Barnard's Star too and, obviously that is the trickiest object. I don't report anything, since neither from HET or UVES paper I've found a convincing fit.
However, briefly I've summarized observed results (Chi Square<<0.1) in graphical form to not type a "fathoms-long" topic.
I have put Sun and Mercury's mutual distances to compare with M-dwarf/planetary objects ones.
Enjoy:


Some planets show relatively mild eccentricity and few others high ones, but most of the objects lies in circular orbit.
Among most interesting cases I underline those of GJ 272 and GJ 671. The former shows two super-earths in close orbits and the latter a low-mass hot Neptune and a GJ 876 c-like dwarf-jovian within system's habitable zone.
Feedback is welcome.
Do you remember the paper A Dedicated M Dwarf Planet Search Using The Hobby-Eberly Telescope?
The paper talks about detection efficiency of low mass exoplanets around nearby red dwarfs. Even a more recent one from UVES talks about the same but observing another stock of nearby M dwarfs.
However radial velocity sets are not available in written form, but in graphical one. Employing bitmap, wordpad and a bit of patience, I've extracted vels and sys files for related stellar objects and I've performed a Systemic Console search for planets.
Results are interesting.
Most of the stars show clear signals of short-period bodies in tight orbits and few ones even hints of additional longer period companions.
Among these I notice the very nearby star GJ 687 (or BD+68 946) once suspected to host a massive substellar object in wide and eccentric orbit (>10 Mj e<0.9). Well, the best fit consist in a close-in hot earth and a "low-mass" brown dwarf (or massive superplanet) at 6.17 AUs and e=0.8.
Between survey stars there is Barnard's Star too and, obviously that is the trickiest object. I don't report anything, since neither from HET or UVES paper I've found a convincing fit.
However, briefly I've summarized observed results (Chi Square<<0.1) in graphical form to not type a "fathoms-long" topic.
I have put Sun and Mercury's mutual distances to compare with M-dwarf/planetary objects ones.
Enjoy:


Some planets show relatively mild eccentricity and few others high ones, but most of the objects lies in circular orbit.
Among most interesting cases I underline those of GJ 272 and GJ 671. The former shows two super-earths in close orbits and the latter a low-mass hot Neptune and a GJ 876 c-like dwarf-jovian within system's habitable zone.
Feedback is welcome.

Edasich- Saturn-Mass

- Number of posts: 490
Age: 25
Location: Tau Ceti d - Northern hemisphere
Registration date: 2008-06-02

Re: Amateur Finds
When fitting these planets in Systemic, what kind of values did you get for the F-test?
_________________
Conspiracy theories aren't real, the government just wants you to think they are so they can steal your thoughts when you aren't looking.

Sirius_Alpha- Admin

- Number of posts: 983
Location: Earth
Registration date: 2008-04-06

Re: Amateur Finds
Gives me chi-square close to 0 and jitter = NaN

Edasich- Saturn-Mass

- Number of posts: 490
Age: 25
Location: Tau Ceti d - Northern hemisphere
Registration date: 2008-06-02

Re: Amateur Finds
One of the things to watch out for is effect of rotation, which may mimic a planet.
Lazarus- Jovian

- Number of posts: 581
Registration date: 2008-06-13
Re: Amateur Finds
Even activity must be accounted. I say this little research of mine has few scientific feasibility, but it's a nice speculative work.
However the GJ 687's case is interesting, since seems to not rule out the long period superplanet in eccentric orbit and hints the presence of a super-earth too.
However the GJ 687's case is interesting, since seems to not rule out the long period superplanet in eccentric orbit and hints the presence of a super-earth too.

Edasich- Saturn-Mass

- Number of posts: 490
Age: 25
Location: Tau Ceti d - Northern hemisphere
Registration date: 2008-06-02

Re: Amateur Finds
Edasich wrote:Gives me chi-square close to 0 and jitter = NaN
What about F-test?
Edit: After looking at the data plots in the paper you referenced, I can certainly see how you got your planets. With so few points though, it doesn't look too robust, like you said. Don't forget your fits! Maybe you can compare them later to future detections of planets around these stars.
_________________
Conspiracy theories aren't real, the government just wants you to think they are so they can steal your thoughts when you aren't looking.

Sirius_Alpha- Admin

- Number of posts: 983
Location: Earth
Registration date: 2008-04-06

Re: Amateur Finds
Edasich wrote:Among most interesting cases I underline those of GJ 272 and GJ 671. The former shows two super-earths in close orbits and the latter a low-mass hot Neptune and a GJ 876 c-like dwarf-jovian within system's habitable zone.
Hey Edasich,
What are your parameters for this star ? Because after my calculations, GJ 671 c does not lie in the HZ. Or am I wrong ?
Bye
Sedna
Sedna- Rock

- Number of posts: 47
Registration date: 2008-08-21
Re: Amateur Finds
Sedna wrote:Edasich wrote:Among most interesting cases I underline those of GJ 272 and GJ 671. The former shows two super-earths in close orbits and the latter a low-mass hot Neptune and a GJ 876 c-like dwarf-jovian within system's habitable zone.
Hey Edasich,
What are your parameters for this star ? Because after my calculations, GJ 671 c does not lie in the HZ. Or am I wrong ?
Bye
Sedna
As I've said in another thread, I have used parameters from NsTed database
http://nsted.ipac.caltech.edu/

Edasich- Saturn-Mass

- Number of posts: 490
Age: 25
Location: Tau Ceti d - Northern hemisphere
Registration date: 2008-06-02

Re: Amateur Finds
Oh, excuse me, I didn't read the other thread. I used NstED too; so why a difference with the same data ?
Sedna- Rock

- Number of posts: 47
Registration date: 2008-08-21
Permissions of this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum





