Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Page 3 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Sirius_Alpha on 25th November 2012, 3:24 am

From my notes, here are the planets not on the EPE.

BOKS-1 bhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1010.4106
HAT-P-7 chttp://arxiv.org/abs/1209.4422
Gliese 676A bhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1206.7118
Gliese 676A chttp://arxiv.org/abs/1206.7118
Gliese 676A dhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1206.7118
Gliese 676A ehttp://arxiv.org/abs/1206.7118
HD 24496bSee note.
HD 4732 bhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1210.6798
HD 4732 chttp://arxiv.org/abs/1210.6798
KELT-3 bhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1211.1031Now on EPE: link
KOI-1215 bhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1210.7810
KOI-1215 chttp://arxiv.org/abs/1210.7810
KOI-152 bhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1210.7810
KOI-152 chttp://arxiv.org/abs/1210.7810
KOI-156 bhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1210.7810
KOI-156 chttp://arxiv.org/abs/1210.7810
KOI-1589 bhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1210.7810
KOI-1589 chttp://arxiv.org/abs/1210.7810
KOI-775 bhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1210.7810
KOI-775 chttp://arxiv.org/abs/1210.7810
KOI-841 chttp://arxiv.org/abs/1210.7810
KOI-869 bhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1208.3312
KOI-869 chttp://arxiv.org/abs/1208.3312
KOI-880 bhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1208.3312
KOI-880 chttp://arxiv.org/abs/1208.3312
KOI-898 bhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1208.3312
KOI-898 chttp://arxiv.org/abs/1208.3312
Lupus-TR-3http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.5121


Oddities
BOKS-1 is mentioned as confirmed in the discovery paper but not categorised as such on the EPE.

Gliese 785 c listed as HD 192310 c in a separate system.

HD 24496 b was mentioned in a paper "FIVE NEW GIANT EXOPLANETS FROM THE CALIFORNIA PLANET SURVEY" that I could only access from a cached copy of the paper mentioned here, but all links to that paper have been replaced by a new paper "The California Planet Survey I. Four New Giant Exoplanets" at the same link in Edasich's post. So I do not know if this planet is retracted. I tried to e-mail Howard (paper's lead author) but got no response. If anyone knows what's up with this planet, please let me know.

KIC 10905746 b and KIC 6185331 b - EPE has them as confirmed planets but their discovery paper explicitly stated they were not confirmed.
We present the rst two planet candidates, discovered by Planet Hunters using Q1 data: KIC 10905746 and KIC 6315331 ... these two candidates are not con rmed planets.
EPE has KIC 12557548 b as a confirmed planet. I do not count it as one.

Several KOI planets are shown to have transit timing variations from which they derive densities, as described in this paper. EPE does not list these planets.

Did not the EPE have Lupus-TR-3 at one time?


Last edited by Sirius_Alpha on 16th December 2012, 1:59 pm; edited 2 times in total

_________________
Caps Lock: Cruise control for 'Cool'!
avatar
Sirius_Alpha
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 3402
Location : Earth
Registration date : 2008-04-06

View user profile http://solar-flux.forumandco.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by jyril on 25th November 2012, 4:53 am

Sirius_Alpha wrote:Did not the EPE have Lupus-TR-3 at one time?

Yes it did. Wonder why it has been dropped. Database glitch?

_________________
The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine.
avatar
jyril
Planetesimal
Planetesimal

Number of posts : 133
Registration date : 2008-06-09

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Lazarus on 25th November 2012, 6:21 am

Well BOKS-1b, Gliese 676Ab and Lupus-TR-3b are in the unconfirmed section at least. HAT-P-7 "c" is so far as I am aware just a linear RV trend so I'd say its omission is fairly reasonable at this point.

As for the rest, that's quite a lot of missing entries!
avatar
Lazarus
dG star
dG star

Number of posts : 2771
Registration date : 2008-06-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Edasich on 26th November 2012, 5:01 am

I would add HD 203030 b which is planet-mass and a couple of WISE binaries whose secondary masse fall well within planetary domain (8 < m <20 Mj ).

I've tried sending an e-mail to report this, but no results.

Only EPE's bibliography is updated.
avatar
Edasich
dM star
dM star

Number of posts : 1500
Location : Tau Ceti g - Mid Latitudes
Registration date : 2008-06-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Stalker on 4th June 2013, 6:36 am

Sirius_Alpha wrote:From my notes, here are the planets not on the EPE.
BOKS-1 bhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1010.4106

I guess this doesnt exist, an 1.12 Rj must be spotted by Keppler. If BOKS-1 b exist it already have a Kepler-XX name.


Last edited by Sirius_Alpha on 4th June 2013, 9:46 am; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : Formatting.)

_________________
avatar
Stalker
Jovian
Jovian

Number of posts : 522
Age : 26
Location : Paris, France
Registration date : 2008-06-16

View user profile http://exoplanetes.wetpaint.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Sirius_Alpha on 4th June 2013, 9:47 am

Not necessarily. There are a number of hot Jupiter KOIs that are awaiting confirmation. With limited follow-up resources, only interesting KOIs will be targeted for follow-up. Not knowing what KIC number corresponds to BOKS-1 makes it hard to make any statement about whether or not Kepler saw it.

_________________
Caps Lock: Cruise control for 'Cool'!
avatar
Sirius_Alpha
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 3402
Location : Earth
Registration date : 2008-04-06

View user profile http://solar-flux.forumandco.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Stalker on 4th June 2013, 10:03 am

It would be interesting to send an e-mail to the autors of the discovery paper of BOKS-1 b.

_________________
avatar
Stalker
Jovian
Jovian

Number of posts : 522
Age : 26
Location : Paris, France
Registration date : 2008-06-16

View user profile http://exoplanetes.wetpaint.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by pochimax on 4th June 2013, 10:50 am

Sirius_Alpha wrote:Not knowing what KIC number corresponds to BOKS-1 makes it hard to make any statement about whether or not Kepler saw it.
From the paper: KID9595827 (BOKS-1), isn' t it?

Planet "validated", not confirmed by RVs because star faintness
avatar
pochimax
Planetary Embryo
Planetary Embryo

Number of posts : 89
Location : Torrejon, Spain
Registration date : 2011-09-09

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Stalker on 21st July 2013, 1:34 am

From planets hunters: BOKS-1=KID9595827=KOI-217
http://talk.planethunters.org/discussions/DPH101ox6l?object_id=APH73011831

And some other sources:
http://www.aavso.org/vsx/index.php?view=detail.top&oid=249731
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AAS...22031804Q

EDIT: And KOI-217 is Kepler-71!
http://kepler.nasa.gov/mission/discoveries/

_________________
avatar
Stalker
Jovian
Jovian

Number of posts : 522
Age : 26
Location : Paris, France
Registration date : 2008-06-16

View user profile http://exoplanetes.wetpaint.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Sirius_Alpha on 21st July 2013, 8:45 am

Huh, So three entries in my notes end up being all the same planet.

_________________
Caps Lock: Cruise control for 'Cool'!
avatar
Sirius_Alpha
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 3402
Location : Earth
Registration date : 2008-04-06

View user profile http://solar-flux.forumandco.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Stalker on 21st July 2013, 9:21 am

One mystery over Very Happy 

_________________
avatar
Stalker
Jovian
Jovian

Number of posts : 522
Age : 26
Location : Paris, France
Registration date : 2008-06-16

View user profile http://exoplanetes.wetpaint.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Stalker on 22nd July 2013, 12:17 pm

Also KIC 10905746 b is KOI-1725.01 and KIC 6185331 b is KOI-1727.01.

I have some questions about planets listed as "controversial" in EPE but seems confirmed in the litterature.

•DQ Her(ab) c: 77.8% confirmed in the discovery paper
•Z Cha(ab) c: seems confirmed and/but mass=20 Mj (81.6%)
•Gliese 22 B b: seems confirmed… (and in a quadruple star system, very interesting)
•HD 208487 c: seems confirmed
•MOA-2010-BLG-073Lb: seems confirmed in the discovery paper and not challenged since

Why this 5 planets are listed as controversial?

•TYC 2627A b: poorly known parameters
•Lupus-TR-3 b: poorly known parameters

What do you think about this two?

_________________
avatar
Stalker
Jovian
Jovian

Number of posts : 522
Age : 26
Location : Paris, France
Registration date : 2008-06-16

View user profile http://exoplanetes.wetpaint.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Sirius_Alpha on 22nd July 2013, 4:56 pm

I posted a link to the Lupus-TR-3b paper earlier in this thread. Do you have references for DQ Her (AB)c, Z Cha(AB)c, GJ 22 Bb? I don't have them in my notes.

_________________
Caps Lock: Cruise control for 'Cool'!
avatar
Sirius_Alpha
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 3402
Location : Earth
Registration date : 2008-04-06

View user profile http://solar-flux.forumandco.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Stalker on 22nd July 2013, 5:42 pm

Plausible explanations for the variations of orbital period in the old nova DQ Herculis
http://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2009/33/aa10909-08/aa10909-08.html

Evidence of a Brown Dwarf in the Eclipsing Dwarf Nova Z Chamaeleonis
http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/703/1/109/pdf/0004-637X_703_1_109.pdf

Could Gliese 22 Bb be detected by direct imaging
http://wwwhip.obspm.fr/PasDeDeux/squelettes/doc/Proceedings/PasDeDeux-Andrade-87.pdf

_________________
avatar
Stalker
Jovian
Jovian

Number of posts : 522
Age : 26
Location : Paris, France
Registration date : 2008-06-16

View user profile http://exoplanetes.wetpaint.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Stalker on 24th July 2013, 2:36 am

In your opinion, can I add DQ Her(ab) c, Z Cha(ab) c, Gliese 22 B b, HD 208487 c and MOA-2010-BLG-073Lb to my database?

_________________
avatar
Stalker
Jovian
Jovian

Number of posts : 522
Age : 26
Location : Paris, France
Registration date : 2008-06-16

View user profile http://exoplanetes.wetpaint.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Sirius_Alpha on 24th July 2013, 3:40 am

I would not include DQ Her (AB)b until it is determined which of the three mechanisms mentioned by Dai et al. are responsible for the observed O-C behaviour of the eclipses.

For Z Cha, they state that the confidence for a tertiary component orbiting the sytem is "> 81.6%." This is, in my opinion, not sufficient to consider it a confirmed planet candidate.

In the case of GJ 22 Bb, they present two orbital solutions, both of them have the edge of the planetary mass regime in their error margins, so you could probably argue that this could be a planet candidate (There are certainly less appealing candidates on the EPE anyhow).

I personally have chosen to include MOA-2010-BLG-073L b as a planet candidate in my notes.

I have HD 208487 c listed in my notes as unconfirmed.

_________________
Caps Lock: Cruise control for 'Cool'!
avatar
Sirius_Alpha
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 3402
Location : Earth
Registration date : 2008-04-06

View user profile http://solar-flux.forumandco.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Stalker on 24th July 2013, 4:45 am

OK. For HD 208487 c, I read today that it may be stellar origin.

2 more planets un my data, 981 planets, the 1000 is very close.

I have some more planets that seems corfirmed but negleted by EPE and tothers catalogs, do you want to see them?

_________________
avatar
Stalker
Jovian
Jovian

Number of posts : 522
Age : 26
Location : Paris, France
Registration date : 2008-06-16

View user profile http://exoplanetes.wetpaint.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Sirius_Alpha on 25th July 2013, 8:21 am

Stalker wrote:I have some more planets that seems corfirmed but negleted by EPE and tothers catalogs, do you want to see them?
Sure Smile

This conversation with you has encouraged me to compile some of my notes together in HTML format and post them online. It's rather rough, there are some things I need to do like unit normalisation, adding links to discovery papers, declaring which star is orbited, etc, but here's my list of exoplanets from my notes. I'll further develop this when I have time, it was just a quick throw-together.
http://exoplanetmusings.wordpress.com/planet-list/

Critique welcome by anyone.
Note: Haven't yet added WASP-75b or OGLE-2012-BLG-0358Lb

_________________
Caps Lock: Cruise control for 'Cool'!
avatar
Sirius_Alpha
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 3402
Location : Earth
Registration date : 2008-04-06

View user profile http://solar-flux.forumandco.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Stalker on 25th July 2013, 9:18 am

What the difference between white and grey planets?

_________________
avatar
Stalker
Jovian
Jovian

Number of posts : 522
Age : 26
Location : Paris, France
Registration date : 2008-06-16

View user profile http://exoplanetes.wetpaint.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Sirius_Alpha on 25th July 2013, 9:22 am

Stalker wrote:What the difference between white and grey planets?
Single- vs multi-planet systems. Sorry if that wasn't clear. I can remove that if necessary.

_________________
Caps Lock: Cruise control for 'Cool'!
avatar
Sirius_Alpha
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 3402
Location : Earth
Registration date : 2008-04-06

View user profile http://solar-flux.forumandco.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Stalker on 25th July 2013, 9:42 am

Just say it. I have already a problem, I can't find any planet around 57 Virginis, wathever the name i'm using.

It's strange but CD-35 2722 b is on EPE but not in mine catalog.

DW Lyn is nor in my catalog nor in EPE, but i found the discovery paper, tanks.

_________________
avatar
Stalker
Jovian
Jovian

Number of posts : 522
Age : 26
Location : Paris, France
Registration date : 2008-06-16

View user profile http://exoplanetes.wetpaint.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Sirius_Alpha on 25th July 2013, 10:09 am

I don't have a 57 Vir but I do have a 59 Vir = GJ 504.

_________________
Caps Lock: Cruise control for 'Cool'!
avatar
Sirius_Alpha
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 3402
Location : Earth
Registration date : 2008-04-06

View user profile http://solar-flux.forumandco.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Stalker on 25th July 2013, 10:28 am

Ho sorry...
You list HD 10180 b as confirmed, but it still unconfirmed in the last paper I saw.
Ad you forgot KELT-6 b.
NN Ser b and c are instable and Pc=2Pb, like in most of "planetary systems" around CV, some authors thinks there is no planets there.
Same for NSVS 14256825.
OPH-11 is no longer in my catalog because of the very high mass of the secondary... I choose to not take into account +13Mj objets around brown dwarves. Because it's a fuc**ng binary brown dwarf with a ridiculous mass ratio of 2.5!Razz 

I dont verified all your HD XXX planets but I think there is a problem with your catalog, may be you have the same planets with different names, because 1022 planets is just too much. Even with my 24 rogue planets i have only 1015! May be you catalog is right but it seems difficult.

As some people said on the forum, you may add WISE J1711+3500 B and WISE J1217+1626 B wich masses may be under 13 Mj, and SWIFT J1756.9 b with minimum mass of 7 Mj and maximum mass of 31 Mj. Yes it is a former star, but it's the same for PSR 1719-14 b!


Last edited by Stalker on 25th July 2013, 11:41 am; edited 2 times in total

_________________
avatar
Stalker
Jovian
Jovian

Number of posts : 522
Age : 26
Location : Paris, France
Registration date : 2008-06-16

View user profile http://exoplanetes.wetpaint.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Sirius_Alpha on 25th July 2013, 11:28 am

Did you account for the fact that I include the Solar System planets?
I'm still adding the planets you've mentioned and am getting around to some of the others you have mentioned. Thanks for the feedback Smile
You're more than welcome to see if you can figure out which planets I unjustly have counted. I would imagine some of the discrepancy might be in the KOI planets. I've taken a few from power point presentations and that's where a lot of the discrepancy between the EPE and I come in.

_________________
Caps Lock: Cruise control for 'Cool'!
avatar
Sirius_Alpha
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 3402
Location : Earth
Registration date : 2008-04-06

View user profile http://solar-flux.forumandco.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Stalker on 25th July 2013, 11:36 am

I'm counting the solar system too in the 1015 ones. My list of rogue and cluster planets are in this thread

I didn't checked KOI and KIC planets either, and yes it may be the source of a part of the error, but in my opinion, it's not enough. I will compare to mine this evening.

Your N/X Consellation, 2MASS, MOA, OGLE, BD and GJ seems OK

Edit: KELT-6 b's discovery paper have disapeared from the litterature... and it's accounted as controversial in EPE.

_________________
avatar
Stalker
Jovian
Jovian

Number of posts : 522
Age : 26
Location : Paris, France
Registration date : 2008-06-16

View user profile http://exoplanetes.wetpaint.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia redesigned

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 3 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum